بهداشت و بیماری‌های عفونی دام

بهداشت و بیماری‌های عفونی دام

تاثیر مقادیرمختلف مکمل پروبیوتیکی Bio-Aqua بر برخی شاخصه‌های رشد و ریخت شناسی بافت روده بچه ماهی قزل آلای رنگین کمان (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Department of clinical sciences, Faculty of veterinary medicine, Shahid chamran University of Ahvaz,Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Branch, Islamic Azad University, tabriz, Iran
چکیده
امروزه استفاده از پروبیوتیک‌ها در حیوانات پرورشی و اثرات مفید آن‌ها به خوبی اثبات شده است. در این مطالعه، تاثیر محصول پروبیوتیکی بیوآکوا (Bio-Aqua ®) در قالب یک طرح تصادفی با چهار تیمار در 3 تکرار به تعداد 360 قطعه ماهی قزل آلای رنگین کمان با وزن متوسط 5/0±10 گرم شامل گروه شاهد (بدون پروبیوتیک)، تیمار اول (1/0گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا)، تیمار دوم (2/0 گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا) و تیمار سوم (3/0گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا) بوده که در جیره غذایی به مدت 45 روز بر روی فاکتورهای رشد (میزان بقا و بازماندگی، درصد افزایش وزن، ضریب تبدیل غذایی، ضریب رشد ویژه، ضریب کارایی پروتئین، ضریب کارایی غذایی و میزان غذای مصرفی) و ریخت شناسی بافت روده (ارتفاع پرز، تعداد سلول‌های جامی شکل، ضخامت لایه اپیتلیوم، ضخامت لایه زیر مخاط و ضخامت لایه عضلانی) انجام شد. نتایج بیان داشت که شاخص‌های درصد افزایش وزن، ضریب تبدیل غذایی، ضریب رشد ویژه، میزان کارایی پروتئین، میزان غذای مصرفی و میزان کارایی غذایی بیشترین مقدار با اختلاف معنی داری نسبت به سایرین، مربوط به تیمار 3 ( 3/0 گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا) بوده و کمترین میزان در گروه شاهد مشاهده شد(p<0.05). هم‌چنین در این بررسی میزان بقا و بازماندگی 100 درصد بود و هیچ‌گونه تلفاتی ثبت نشد. در مورد نتایج بافت شناسی، بیشترین میزان ارتفاع پرز و تعداد سلول‌های جامی با اختلاف معنی داری به ترتیب مربوط به تیمارهای دوم ( 2/0 گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا) و سوم ( 3/0 گرم پروبیوتیک به ازای هر کیلوگرم غذا) بوده و کمترین مقدار مربوط به گروه شاهد بود(p>0.05). هم‌چنین اختلاف معنی داری در ضخامت لایه اپیتلیوم و لایه عضلانی مشاهده نشد(p>0.05). اما ضخامت لایه زیر مخاط در تیمار سوم بیشترین مقدار را دارا بود(p>0.05). با توجه به نتایج حاضر اینگونه می‌توان استنباط کرد که استفاده از این مکمل پروبیوتیکی به میزان 300گرم به ازای هر تن غذا می‌تواند منجر به بهبود عملکرد رشد و هیستومورفومتری روده شده که موجب افزایش بهره وری اقتصادی می‌گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of different amounts of Bio-Aqua probiotic supplement on some growth parameters and histomorphometry of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry.

نویسندگان English

Hamzeh Mohtashemi Pour 1
Shahab Notash 2
1 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid chamran University of Ahvaz,Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Branch, Islamic Azad University, tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Background and Aim: Today, the beneficial effects of probiotics and their usage in farm animals have been well proven.
Materials and Methods: In this study, the effect of a probiotic product called Bio-Aqua ® was evaluated in a randomized design with four treatments in three replications. For this purpose, 360 rainbow trout with an average weight of 10±0.5 grams were divided into several groups, including the control group (without probiotics), the first treatment (0.1 grams of probiotics per kilogram of food), the second treatment (2 0.0 gram of probiotic per kilogram of food) and the third treatment (0.3 gram of probiotic per kilogram of food). This ration was used for 45 days to evaluate the growth factors (survival rate, weight gain percentage, food conversion factor, specific growth factor, protein efficiency factor, food efficiency factor and the amount of food consumed) and intestinal tissue morphology (villi height, number goblet cells, the thickness of the epithelium layer, the thickness of the submucosa layer and the thickness of the muscle layer).
Results: The results showed that the indices of weight gain, food conversion factor, specific growth factor, protein efficiency, food consumption and food efficiency were the highest with a significant difference, related to third treatment 2 compared to others and the lowest amount was observed in the control group (p<0.05). Also, in this survey, the survival rate was 100% and no casualties were recorded. Regarding the histological results, it should be said that the highest amount of villus height and the number of goblet cells with a significant difference are related to the second treatments and the third treatments and the lowest value was related to the control group (p>0.05). Ferthermore, no significant difference was observed in the thickness of the epithelium layer and muscle layer (p>0.05). But the thickness of the submucosa layer was the highest in the third treatment (p>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the present results, it can be concluded that the use of this probiotic supplement at the rate of 300 grams per ton of food can lead to improved growth performance and intestinal histomorphometry, which increases economic productivity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

probiotic
growth factors
histomorphometry
Rainbow trout
  1. Abd El-Rhman A M, Khattab Y A E, Shalaby A M E. Micrococcus luteus and Pseudomonas species as probiotics for promoting the growth performance and health of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Fish Shellfish Immunol.2009; 27 (2) :175–180.
  2. Adeshina I, & Ajala B E. Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus enhanced the growth, gut morphometry, antioxidant capacity, and the immune response in juveniles of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio, Fish Physiol. Biochem.2020; 46 (4) :1375–1385.
  3. Ahmadmoradi M, Alishahi M, Soltanian S, Shahriari A, & Yektaseresht A. Effects of encapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum on probiotic potential and reducing lead toxicity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum). Aquaculture International, 2023; 1-23.
  4. Amoah K, Huang QC, Tan BP, Zhang S, Chi SY, Yang QH, & Dong X H. Dietary supplementation of probiotic Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050, improves the growth performance, intestinal morphology, microflora, immune response, and disease confrontation of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish & shellfish immunology 2019; (87): 796-808.
  5. Aly S M, & Mohamed M F. Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of Tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections, Fish Shellfish Immunol.2008; 25 (1) :128–136.
  6. Aly S M, Mohamed M F, John G. Effect of probiotics on the survival, growth and challenge infection in Tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus), Aquacult. Res.2008; 39 (6) :647–656.
  7. Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Muzquiz JL. The Role of Probiotics in Aquaculture.Veterinary Microbiology. 2006; 114(3-4): 173-186.
  8. Boonanuntanasarn S, & Nakharuthai C. Effects of microencapsulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth, hematological indices, blood chemical, and immune parameters and intestinal morphology in striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, Probiotics Antimicrob. Prot. 2019; 11 (2) : 427–437.
  9. Bostock B, McAndrew R, Richards K, Jauncey T, Telfer K, Lorenzen D, Little L, Ross N, Handisyde I. Aquaculture: global status and trends, Phil. Trans. Biol. Sci. 2010; 365 (1554): 2897–2912.
  10. Bunnoy A, Na-Nakorn U, Srisapoome P. Probiotic effects of a novel strain, Acinetobacter KU011TH, on the growth performance, immune responses, and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila of bighead catfish (Clarias macrocephalus Günther, 1864), Microorganisms 2019; 7 (12): 613.
  11. Carnevali O, Zamponi M C, & Cresci A. Administration of probiotic strain to improve sea bream wellness during development, Aquacult. Int.2004; 12 (4) :377–386.
  12. Choobkar N, Kakoolaki SH, Sahraeei F, Aghajani AR, Rezaeemanesh M, Mohammadi F. Study of effect of probiotic enriched food on growth parameters of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal. 2019; 27(5): 115-124.
  13. Cota-Gast´elum L A, & Peraza-G´omez V. Effect of Pediococcus sp., Pediococcus pentosaceus, inulin and fulvic acid, added to the diet, on growth of Oreochromis niloticus, Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.2013; 7 (48) :5489– 5495.
  14. Dawood M A, Abo-Al-Ela H G, & Hasan M T.Modulation of transcriptomic profile in aquatic animals: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics scenarios. Fish & shellfish immunology,2020; (97): 268-282.
  15. Dimitroglou A, Merrifield DL, Moate R, Davies SJ, Spring P, Sweetman J, Bradley G. Dietary mannan oligosaccharide supplementation modulates intestinal microbial ecology and improves gut morphology of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus
    mykiss (Walbaum). Journal of animal science.(10): 3226-3234.
  16. El-Saadony M T, Alagawany M, Patra A K, Kar I, Tiwari R, Dawood M A, & Abdel-Latif H M .The functionality of probiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Fish & shellfish immunology 2021; (117): 36-52.
  17. Escaffre EF, Kaushik S, Mambrini M. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the digestive tract of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) due to fish meal replacement with soy protein concentrate.
    Aquaculture. 2007; v. 273, n. 2-3, p. 127-138.
  18. FAO, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the SustainableDevelopment Goals, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations., Rome, Italy, 2018.
  19. Ferguson R M W, Davies S J. The effect ofPediococcus acidilactici on the gut microbiota and immune status of on-growing red tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), J. Appl. Microbiol.2010; 109 (3): 851–862.
  20. Jamali H, Jafaryan H, Patimar R, Soltani M. Application of multi-species of bacillus in Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) larvae nutrition via Bio-enrichment of Artemia parthenogenetica nauplii. J. of Utilization and Cultivation of Aquatics. 2012; Vol. 1(3): 85- 102.
  21. Hosseini far H, Poor Amini M. Application of probiotics and prebiotics in aquaculture. Tehran: Green Wave Publications; 2007.
  22. Kuebutornye F K, Abarike E D, & Lu Y. A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture. Fish & shellfish immunology 2019; (87): 820-828.
  23. Li P, Gatlin Iii DM. Nucleotide Nutrition in Fish: Current Knowledge and Future Applications. Aquaculture. 2006; 251(2-4): 141-152.
  24. Li J, Ni J, Li J, & Yan Q. Comparative study on gastrointestinal microbiota of eight fish species with different feeding habits, J. Appl. Microbiol.2014; 117 (6) :1750–1760.
  25. Liu M, Song S, Hu C, Tang L, Lam J C, Lam P K, & Chen L. Dietary administration of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus modulates the neurological toxicities of perfluorobutanesulfonate in zebrafish. Environmental Pollution 2020; (265): 114832.
  26. Merrifield DLA, Dimitroglou A, Foey SJ, Davies RTM, Baker J, Bøgwald M, Castex, E Ringø. The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids. Aquaculture. 2010; 302:1–18.
  27. Merrifield D L, Dimitroglou A, & Davies S G. Probiotic applications for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) I. Effects on growth performance, feed utilization, intestinal microbiota and related health criteria, Aquacult. Nutr.2010; 16 (5) : 504– 510.
  28. Mohammadian T, Modanlu M, Jangaran A, Azhdari A. Nutrition in aquaculture. Ahvaz: Publications of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz; 2020.
  29. Mujeeb Rahiman K M, Jesmi Y, Thomas A P. Mohamed Hatha A A. Probiotic effect of Bacillus NL110 and Vibrio NE17 on the survival, growth performance and immune response of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man), Aquacult. Res.2010; 41 (9) : e120–e134.
  30. Nakandakare IB, Iwashita MKP, Dias DDC, Tachibana L, Ranzani-Paiva MJT, Romagosa E. Growth performance and intestinal histomorphology of Nile tilapia juveniles fed probiotics. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 2013; 35. 365-370.
  31. Nayak SK. Probiotics and immunity: a fish perspective. Fish & shellfish immunology. 2010; 29(1). 2-14.
  32. Nayak S. Multifaceted applications of probiotic Bacillus species in aquaculture with special reference to Bacillus subtilis, Rev. Aquacult.2021; 13 (2): 862–906.
  33. Nimrat S, Suksawat S, Boonthai T, Vuthiphandchai V. Potential Bacillus probiotics enhance bacterial numbers, water quality and growth during early development of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), Vet. Microbiol.2012; 159 (3) : 443–450.
  34. Ngamkala S, Futami K, Endo M, Maita M, Katagiri T. Immunological effects of glucan and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, a probiotic bacterium, on Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus intestine with oral Aeromonas challenges, Fish. Sci.2010; 76 (5): 833–840.
  35. Oliveira FC, Kasai RYD, Fernandes CE, Souza da Silva W, De Campos CM. Probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotics supplementation on growth performance and intestinal histomorphometry Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum larvae. Journal of Applied Aquaculture. 2022; 34(2). 279-293.
  36. Panigrahi A, & Gopikrishna G. Bioaugmentation of heterotrophic bacteria in biofloc system improves growth, survival, and immunity of Indian white shrimp Penaeus indicus, Fish Shellfish Immunol.2020; (98): 477–487.
  37. Pérez-Sánchez T, Mora-Sánchez B, & Balcázar J. Biological approaches for disease control in aquaculture: advantages, limitations and challenges. Trends in microbiology 2018; 26(11): 896-903.
  38. Pourmozaffar S, Tamadoni Jahromi S, Rameshi H, & Gozari M. Evaluation of some haemolymph biochemical properties andF‐cell prevalence in hepatopancreas of white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vanammei) after fed diets containing apple cider vinegar and propionic acid. Aquaculture research,2019; 50(11): 3435-3443.
  39. Ridha M T, Azad L S. Preliminary evaluation of growth performance and immune response of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus supplemented with two putative probiotic bacteria, Aquacult. Res.2012; 43 (6) :843– 852.
  40. Ringø E, Van Doan H, & Song S K. Probiotics, lactic acid bacteria and bacilli: interesting supplementation for aquaculture, J. Appl. Microbiol.2020; 129 (1): 116–136.
  41. Sadeghi J, & Zadsar N. Study of Pediococcus pentosaceus effect on histomorphometrical structure of intestine in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhyncus mikiss). Veterinary research and biological products. 2017; 116: 233-245.
  42. Santos L, & Ramos F. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: Current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,2018; 52(2): 135-143.
  43. Segner H, Sundh H, Buchmann K, Douxfils J, Sundell KS, Mathieu C, Ruane N, Jutfelt F, Toften H, Vaughan L. Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012; (38): 85_105.
  44. Standen B T, & Merrifield D L. Modulation of the intestinal microbiota and morphology of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, following the application of a multi-species probiotic, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.2015; 99 (20): 8403– 8417.
  45. Standen B T, & Merrifield D L. Dietary administration of a commercial mixed-species probiotic improves growth performance and modulates the intestinal immunity of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, Fish Shellfish Immunol.2016; (49): 427–435.
  46. Valipour A, Nedaei S, Noori A, Khanipour A, & Hoseinifar S H. Dietary Lactobacillus plantarum affected on some immune parameters, air-exposure stress response, intestinal microbiota, digestive enzyme activity and performance of narrow clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus, Eschscholtz). Aquaculture,2019; (504): 121- 130.
  47. Varela J L, Ruiz-Jarabo L, Vargas-Chacoff L, & Mancera J M. Dietary administration of probiotic Pdp11 promotes growth and improves stress tolerance to high stocking density in gilthead seabream Sparus auratus, Aquaculture, 2010; 309 (1) : 265–271.
  48. Venkat H K, Sahu N P, Jain K K. Effect of feeding Lactobacillus-based probiotics on the gut microflora, growth and survival of postlarvae of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man), Aquacult. Res.2004; 35 (5) :501–507. 
  49. Vieco-Saiz N, Belguesmia Y, Raspoet R, & Drider D. Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during foodanimal production, Front. Microbiol. 2019; 10
    (57).
  50. Wang Y C, & Liu C H. Multiple-strain probiotics appear to be more effective in improving the growth performance and health status of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, than single probiotic strains, Fish Shellfish Immunol.2019; 84: 1050–1058.
  51. Wang W, Sun J, Liu C, Xue Z. Application of immunostimulants in aquaculture: current knowledge and future perspectives. Aquac. Res.2017; (48): 1–23.
  52. Wang YB, Li JR, Lin J. Probiotics in Aquaculture: Challenges and Outlook. Aquaculture. 2008; 281(1-4): 1-4.
  53. Wu S, Gao T, Zheng Y, Wang W, Cheng Y, Wang G. Microbial diversity of intestinal contents and mucus in yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco), Aquaculture, 2010; 303 (1) : 1–7.
  54. Zhao C, Men X, Dang Y, Zhou Y, & Ren Y. 
  55. Probiotics Mediate Intestinal Microbiome and Microbiota-Derived Metabolites Regulating the Growth and Immunity of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Microbiology Spectrum, 2023; 11(2): e03980-22.
  56. Ziainejad S, Jafari P, Javaheri M, Mohtaram M. The effect of prebiotic yeast on the indicators of growth, survival and density of Lactobacillus in the intestines of rainbow trout. Journal of Aquacalture Development. 2014; 8(2): 45-54