Animal Health and Infectious Diseases

Animal Health and Infectious Diseases

Serum prevalence of brucellosis based on history of abortion in sheep and goat using serological tests in Piranshahr

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
Abstract
Background and Aim: Brucellosis is a common human-animal disease caused by Brucella bacteria. This study was performed to evaluate the serum prevalence of brucellosis in sheep and goats with a history of abortion in Piranshahr.
Materials and Methods: One of the essential methods for detection is polymerase chain reaction in which Multiplex-PCR method is the fastest way to achieve the desired results. Despite the PCR test simplicity, it can be performed on a large number of samples due to high sensitivity and specificity. This technique was used to simultaneously identify four species of the Brucella family, Brucella mellitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella ovis and, Brucella suis in sheep and goat abortion specimens. 200 serum samples were collected from the Piranshahr region and were first examined for Brucella infection by the Rose Bengal test. Then, in the next step, DNA serum samples were extracted for final confirmation and, specific primers designed based on the 16s rRNA gene were used to detect Brucella. Specific primers of each species were used to identify Brucella species.
Results: According to Rose Bengal test, the results show that 86 samples (43%) of the serum samples (39% of sheep samples and 4% of goat samples) were positive for Brucella. The results of this study were positive for Brucella based on multiple PCR tests of 33 samples (16.5%). Prevalence of infection with different species of Brucella based on multiple PCR tests is as follows: 19 samples (22%) of Brucella abortus species, ten samples (11.6%) of B. mellitensis species, four samples (4.6%) of the samples were infected with B. ovis. The results also showed a significant relationship between abortion and the type of livestock (p <0.05). Abortion occurred more in sheep than in goats by Brucella bacteria.
Conclusion: Finally, none of the samples were infected with Brucella Swiss. As a results, Brucella abortus one biovar and B. melitensis one biovar are common among sheep and goats in Piranshahr region. Moreover, the use of multiplex polymerase chain reaction methods in diagnostic laboratories improves the quality level and increases the detection speed. Finally, the results showed that brucellosis is endemic in flocks of sheep and goats in Piranshahr region.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Corbel M. Recent advances in brucellosis. Journal of medical microbiology. 1997;46(2):101-3. 2. Spanu V, Spanu C, Virdis S, Cossu F, Scarano C, De Santis EPL. Virulence factors and genetic variability of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from rawsheep's milk cheese.
  2. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2012;153(1-2):53-7.
  3. Davydov N. Properties of Brucella isolated from reindeer. Trudy Vsyesoyuz Inst Eksp Vet. 1961;27:24-31.
  4. Shakerian A, Nodargah M. Review of Brucella contamination inMilk and its products of Iran. 2018.
  5. Orzil LdL, Preis IS, Almeida IGd, Souza PGd, Soares PM, Jacinto FB, Fonseca AA. Validation of the multiplex PCR for identification of Brucella spp. Ciência Rural. 2016;46:847-52.
  6. Bricker BJ, Halling SM. Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1994;32(11):2660-6.
  7. Parisi A, Fraccalvieri R, Cafiero M, Miccolupo A, Padalino I, Montagna C, et al. Diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii-related abortion in Italian domestic ruminants using single-tube nested PCR. Veterinary microbiology. 2006;118(1-2):101-6.
  8. SERPE L, GALLO P, FIDANZA N, SCARAMUZZO A, FENIZIA D. Single-step method for rapid detection of Brucella spp. in soft cheese by gene-specific polymerase chain reaction. Journal of dairy research. 1999;66(2):313-7.
  9. Morata P, Queipo-Ortuno MI, Reguera JM, García-Ordonez MA, Cárdenas A, Colmenero JD. Development and evaluation of a PCRenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2003;41(1):144-8.
  10. Morata P, Queipo-Ortuño MI, de Dios Colmenero J. Strategy for optimizing DNA amplification in a peripheral blood PCR assay used for diagnosis of human brucellosis. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1998;36(9):2443-6.
  11. Nielsen K, Smith P, Widdison J, Gall D, Kelly L, Kelly W, Nicoletti P. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O: 9 and Escherichia coli O157: H7. Veterinary microbiology. 2004;100(1-2):25-30.
  12. Mostafavi A, Asmand M. Process of brucellosis (Malta fever) in Iran during 1993- 2006. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology (In Persian). 2012;8:94-101.
  13. Lübeck PS, Skurnik M, Ahrens P, Hoorfar J. A multiplex PCR-detection assay for Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O: 9 and Brucella spp. based on the perosamine synthetase gene. The Genus Yersinia: Springer; 2004. p. 451-4.
  14. Mahzounieh M, Mehri H, Seidi Samani H, Momeni A, Shokuhi A, Khaksar K, et al. Genomic detection of Brucella spp in Seropositive cattle in charmahal va Bakhtiyari province, Iran. Journal of Veterinary Research. 2015;70(4):395-401.
  15. GHOUSIAN MM, KEYVANI AH, ZAHRAEI SM, Khazraeinia P, FALAH N. A comparison of cultureand PCR methods wrights test for diagnosis of brucellosis. 2008.
  16. Ilhan Z, Aksakal A, Ekin I, Gülhan T, Solmaz H, Erdenlig S. Comparison of culture and PCR for the detection of Brucella melitensis in blood and lymphoid tissues of serologically positiveand negative slaughtered sheep. Letters in applied microbiology. 2008;46(3):301-6.
  17. Ghorbani A, Khorasgani MR, ZarkeshEsfahani H, Sharifiyazdi H, Kashani AD, Emami H. Comparison of serology, culture, and PCR for detection of brucellosis in slaughtered camels in Iran. Comparativ. Clinical Pathology. 2013;22(5):913-7.
  18. Thomsen VØ, Kok-Jensen A, Buser M, Philippi-Schulz S, Burkardt H-J. Monitoring treatment of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: can PCR be applied? Journal of clinical microbiology.7-3601:)11(37;1999 .
  19. Probert WS, Schrader KN, Khuong NY, Bystrom SL, Graves MH. Real-time multiplex PCR assay for detection of Brucella spp., B. abortus, and B. melitensis. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2004;42(3):1290-3
  20. Leyla G, Kadri G, Ümran O. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and bacteriological culture for the diagnosis of sheep brucellosis using aborted fetus samples. Veterinary Microbiology. 2003;93(1):53-61.
  21. Solera J, Solis Garcia del Pozo J. Treatment of pulmonary brucellosis: a systematic review. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2017;15(1):33-42.
  22. Zoughi E, EBADI A, Yarahmadi M. Isolation and identification of Brucella organisms in Iran. 2008.
  23. Doosti A, Ghasemi Dehkordi P. Application of real-time PCR for identification and differentiation of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis in cattle. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2011;14(2):109-15.
  24. Khalili M, Sami M, Aflatoonian MR, Shahabi-Nejad N. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in slaughterhouse workers in Kerman city, Iran. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2012;2(6):448-50.
  25. Shafei B, Ahmadi M, DASTMALCHI SH. Diagnosis of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis in the milk of cattle and sheep in Kordestan province by polymerase chain reaction. 2012.
  26. Abdalla A, Hamid ME. Comparison of conventional and non-conventional techniques for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Sudan. Tropical animal health and production. 2012;44(6):1151-5.
  27. Kaynak-Onurdag F, Okten S, Sen B. Screening Brucella spp. in bovine raw milk by real-time quantitative PCR and conventional methods in a pilot region of vaccination, Edirne, Turkey. Journal of dairy science. 2016;99(5):3351-7.
  28. Alizadehmofrad F, Parvini M. Evaluation and Diagnosis of Speciesand Biovars of Brucella among cattles by Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;11(5):107-14.